robertbrigham-books
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Books by Robert
    • When Your Lover Dies
    • Math Is Murder
    • Murder by the Numbers
    • You're Almost There
    • Patriotism
  • Leave Feedback
  • Fluff & Tough(

Ghosts of Christmas Past

12/19/2018

4 Comments

 
I have always loved the Christmas season, from the time I was a little boy to the present day. I was raised in the Episcopal church and, of course, the birth of Jesus was a big deal. We would attend the midnight candlelight service marking the beginning of Christmas day. The church had a large tree and poinsettias, carols filled the air, and parishioners expressed warm wishes to each other. The minister was a nice enough fellow who tried his best, often unsuccessfully, to deliver an inspirational message.
 
I am sorry to say that I remember those services as something to endure so we could get home and get to sleep in order for Santa to arrive. That pretty much sums up my feelings as a child. Christmas was a time when I got gifts! It was about me. Over the years I’ve changed. Now it’s about others.
 
My parents (my early years were spent in the great depression) didn’t have much money, but somehow they always made the day special. One year I received a Lionel O Gauge train: a circular loop of track, an engine, a couple of cars, and a transformer. I was hooked, and that train followed me into adulthood. Every year something new appeared at Christmas. One time it was a pair of switches. I no longer had to traverse just a single circuit. But those switches didn’t come on Christmas day. Their appearance occurred a week prior. My parents were sitting in the living room and I was around somewhere. Suddenly they said, “Did you hear that?” I had heard nothing. They claimed jingle bells had filled the air. “Don’t you hear them?” they said. I did not, but lo and behold, when we walked into the room housing my train, I found a pair of beautifully wrapped switches that Santa had thoughtfully made a special early trip to bring me. And they arrived in time for me to set up the now versatile routes for Christmas!
 
One year I did something that to this day I am ashamed to admit. I went searching for and found where gifts were hidden. They weren’t yet wrapped and I saw what I was to receive that year. Immediately I rued my adventure. On Christmas I would have to fake surprise. And I missed the excitement of the anticipation. I never did that again.
 
I have always loved the Christmas tree. When I was a child in New Jersey my dad and I would go out together to find one. They often were sold by entrepreneurs who’d invested in 15 or 20 trees and set up shop on street corners. It was always cold and it was always fun.
 
After my dad died and my mother moved to an apartment and I went to college, there was a small tree set in her apartment. When I got married and lived in Little Silver, New Jersey, we went to a Christmas Tree farm run by a scientific genius who worked in the research arm of Fort Monmouth. He and his sons ran the business. We would load the amazing tree we purchased on the car. Usually they would be eight feet tall and at least ten feet wide. People would gape as we drove our prize home. Upon moving to Florida we discovered for the small cost of a permit you could cut one tree from the Ocala National Forest. What an outing that was for the family with two children, and two dogs! The occasional rifle shots added an element of suspense. The ride home occasioned our once a year visit to Kentucky Fried Chicken. These trees did not have the thickness of the New Jersey ones, but they were tall. We would pick one about 14 or 15 feet in height and wonder how we’d get it in the front door. But we always did and it went in the stairwell where it extended for two floors. I always worried it might catch fire and that would be disaster. It was a reasonable worry. I saw a man after the holiday take a tree to a field and apply a match. The tree literally exploded and in seconds was gone. Artificial trees have graced our homes the last few decades.
 
I love to decorate the trees. I became an expert at stringing lights. For years I used the ones my father had where one bulb burned out meant the entire string of eight went dark. I should have said string of sixteen. My dad, an electrical engineer, had put two strings in series. That meant they didn’t burn as bright and hence lasted longer, but when one did die it was harder to find the culprit. You’d pick a new bulb, check it on a working string, and then use it to replace the first bulb in the unlit string. If the lights didn’t come on, you took that first bulb which was already off the string and replaced the second bulb with it. Continuing this way, you’d eventually find the bad one. Unless two bulbs were bad! Of course, there were ornaments, many made by our kids. And tinsel! Ah, tinsel. I can’t believe I would fill the tree with it, one strand at a time. I don’t miss it a bit.
 
There is so much I like about the season. I love to wrap. I’m terrible at it, but it doesn’t matter. It lets me think of the person to receive the gift and hope it will be liked. I love shopping for people in stores and am sad so much is now done online. I loved going to New York City and seeing the skaters at Rockefeller Center. I like the fact that most people are nicer, more patient, kinder. And on the day after Christmas I like looking at the gifts I’ve received and thinking about the people who gave them to me, and that I was important enough to them that they would make the effort.
 
A huge pleasure of my life is that I’m surrounded by wonderful folk of other traditions, religions, and cultures. If anyone would like to describe them, I would be honored to post them here, perhaps at a particularly significant time of year.
 
Meanwhile, I wish everyone great joy.
 
NOTE: I’m going to take a couple of weeks off to celebrate the holidays. I hope you’ll rejoin me when I return on January 9.

4 Comments

A Suggestion for Gun-Happy Legislators

12/12/2018

0 Comments

 
A recent report announced the United States will give 17 million dollars to support those affected by the Las Vegas massacre.
 
Individuals who will receive the assistance include victims, their families, medical personnel, first responders, concert staff, and vendors.
 
The funds will be employed for counseling, therapy, rehabilitation, trauma recovery, and legal aid.
 
I think that’s wonderful and I don’t begrudge a cent of it. Nor am I upset about the millions donated, often by private individuals, for those suffering from other shooting tragedies, including Pulse, Parkland, and Sandy Hook. Money can never undo the pain of those incidents, but perhaps it can alleviate some of the suffering.
 
I’ve always been impressed with the response of many of our leaders at all levels of government.
 
They send their thoughts.
 
They offer their prayers.
 
They facilitate the collection of funds.
 
And many suggest a solution to the increasingly frequent deaths caused by firearms: More guns! It’s obvious, isn’t it? If more of us “good” guys had guns, we’d take out the “bad” guys in seconds and save huge numbers of lives. I’ll come back to this in a bit, but let me deviate for a moment.
 
Every day I read of shootings where a single person dies. Or maybe it’s three or five, much too small a number to make the national news these days. As I consider the massive calamities mentioned previously, I can’t help thinking about these “lesser” ones, wondering what are the basic differences.
 
Is the victim any less dead?
 
Are the families any less devastated?
 
Is the need for counseling any less urgent?
 
Is the financial repercussion any less dire?
 
I think not, but there is no concerted special effort to offer the help these victims and families need. And there are over 30,000 of them in our country every year!
 
I think I have a solution, and it should please those legislators who believe more guns is the answer to this national problem.
 
I suggest that every state enact a law that provides a substantial subsidy, perhaps $500,000, to every innocent victim of gun violence or the mourning family. So a state that has 1000 gun related deaths, not an unheard of number, would be out 500 million dollars.
 
Surely our stalwart gun-loving legislators would endorse such a plan with enthusiasm. It would be a win-win situation for them for two reasons.
 
First, they can thump their chests and brag about how much they care for those who have suffered an incident.
 
Second, they can tout how little the cost has been since their policy of more guns has caused the number of shooting deaths to have plummeted.
 
UNLESS!
 
Unless they are wrong, and the availability of more guns does not reduce casualties. Then, just maybe, we could all see the truth of this sickness affecting our nation in a measure more easily understood by those in power: money.
 
So, my good legislators, do you have the courage of your convictions enough to pass such legislation? I bet not.

0 Comments

Research Universities

12/5/2018

0 Comments

 
For 34 years I was on the faculty at what would turn into one of the largest public universities in the country. I have maintained an association in the 14 years since I retired, including teaching the occasional course. Over that time I saw enrollment climb from 5,000 to 65,000. And that wasn’t the only change.
 
When I started, the math faculty was assigned four courses each. My friends teaching high school will say, “Big deal!” In truth, I don’t know how they survive the load they are required to carry. But it is a big load at the college level, especially when each class had about 60 students.
 
We had a department chairman who told us the only thing he cared about was good teaching, no matter what we might hear about the rest of the university. Those of us who joined the faculty at that time were attracted to this because teaching was what was most important to us.
 
Our department chairman did us a disservice. Universities that aspire to graduate education, and mine did, cannot survive on teaching alone. This became clear to me when our founding president stepped aside and a research-oriented leader assumed the post.
 
Fortunately for me, I was carrying out a small amount of research, which was all that was possible with the classroom requirements of the time. Then an amazing thing happened. My new chair told me, since I was doing research, I could have a half time research appointment, resulting in teaching two courses per semester. I was shocked and asked him if he really could do that. He just laughed.
 
That kind of work load was my experience for almost 30 years.
 
Usually there are three levels of faculty: Assistant Professor, Associate Professor and Full Professor. Other levels include instructor and adjunct, but tenure normally is associated with only the professor classes. Newly minted PhDs, and you need a doctorate to be considered, start at the Assistant level. After several years they can apply for tenure and often, if granted tenure, they are simultaneously promoted to Associate.
 
Each step of advancement results from a lengthy evaluation process than can last most of an academic year. A candidate is evaluated in three main areas: teaching, research, and service (committee work, administrative duties, professional society positions, etc.)
 
I think the majority of faculty would agree that, by far, the most important area considered in this evaluation process is research, with service and teaching being of secondary importance. Faculty with many yearly refereed publications and, nowadays, with external grants (read money) stand an excellent chance for advancement, even if they are lousy teachers. Faculty with wonderful student evaluations and recognition from colleagues of their teaching prowess, but with a weak research record, are often in trouble. It is sometimes true that poor teaching can hurt advancement, but poor research is always a killer.
 
Something about this seems wrong to me. I believe that a university has two equally important functions: teaching and research. Some may be surprised by that. It’s a school, after all. Schools teach. But it’s more than a school, it’s an institution of higher learning. Learning, not teaching. Everyone is learning, including faculty. And our country is dependent on the ability of faculty to carry out research independent of the pressures of company or government demands. This, of course, raises questions about tenure, but that’s for a different discussion.
 
So I accept that teaching and research are both essential for a successful experience in higher education. What I don’t understand is why one is more important than the other, or why faculty should be expected to excel in teaching while being rewarded mainly for research.
 
In my opinion, a university should indeed have faculty recognized for their research. They should be expected to teach, but mainly higher level undergraduate and graduate courses. And, of course, supervise master theses and doctoral dissertations.
 
And there should be faculty equally recognized for their teaching. Now don’t let me give the impression that is all such faculty should do. To be truly great teachers they must extend effort in continuous study beyond the levels at which they teach. For one thing, it sets a good example for the students and it also permits greater insight into how what is taught fits into their students’ further study. But they shouldn’t have to be setting the world on fire with this work. Outstanding teaching should be sufficient for advancement just as outstanding research is. I wish it were so.
 
Of course, when there is a faculty member that excels in both areas, and many such individuals do exist, he or she is a treasure who should be honored by their institution. Most are.

0 Comments

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed