robertbrigham-books
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Books by Robert
    • When Your Lover Dies
    • Math Is Murder
    • Murder by the Numbers
    • You're Almost There
    • Patriotism
  • Leave Feedback
  • Fluff & Tough(

Dogs

1/30/2019

4 Comments

 
The first needle calmed her. The second stopped her heart.
 
We had just sanctioned ending the life of one of the truest friends a person could have. A friend who gave infinite love and unlimited forgiveness. Who trusted us. We were told it was the greatest gift we could give her, that her cancer plagued body would deprive her of everything but pain. I want to believe that, but I can’t completely accept the premise nor shake the guilt. And I miss her.
 
Every time this has to be done, we say never again. It’s just too hard. And like most other dog lovers, we ignore those words and set ourselves up once more.
 
Because there is no love quite like that between human and dog.
 
I got my first four-legged friend when I was 12. Our next-door neighbor had a cocker spaniel who went galivanting one evening and several weeks later delivered a half dozen pups. The father has remained anonymous to this day. When I learned the news, I instigated a campaign to harass my parents until they agreed we needed an increase in family size. It wasn’t that difficult a sell.
 
Two of the little ones were promised, but I had my pick of the remaining four. I would have taken them all, but that was an argument I would not win. I loved the one I selected and named him. I said, “I’m going to call him Pal because he’s my pal.” Brilliant, huh? We were inseparable.
 
Then I grew, went to high school and then college, and more of dog duty fell to my mother. One day, while away at school I received notice that Pal had died. And I had my first experience at the loss of a special and truly loved pet. There are more painful events. You can lose a loved human. But dog deaths are right up there on the difficulty level.
 
It was as I grew older that I began to wonder why we put ourselves in such situations. I think I know. It’s a tradeoff. You trade 10 to 15 years of unrestricted love for indescribable pain when he or she comes to the Rainbow Bridge. It must be worth it, because, as I said, most of us eventually find ourselves with a new love bundle before too long. I still miss Pal and there are tears in my eyes as I write this.
 
Pal was the first of many. At one point in my life I discovered my family had three dogs! We had recently lost our single pet and were ready to begin anew. We went to the pound and found the perfect dog. That isn’t quite true. My wife found the perfect dog. My daughter found the perfect dog. The problem was, the perfect dog wasn’t a single dog. You guessed it. We came home with the incredibly ugly Fudge for my daughter and the incredibly stupid Xanthippe for my wife. One friend said, “On an intelligence scale from 1 to 1000, Xanthippe earns a 7!” But what Fudge lacked in looks and Xanthippe in smarts were made up by rating a million in love. And as I looked at these new entries in our lives I realized not for the first time the awesome responsibility that was placed on us. These precious beings trusted us and others to be kind, provide food and walks, and give them a safe life. In return, they would provide unbounded love.
 
This was my first experience with more than a single dog. Of course, I did a lot of the walking and I soon mastered the art of handling two.
 
But then there was Dido. Dido didn’t come from the pound, or anywhere else as far as I could determine. She just appeared on our front lawn, half the size of our other already small pets. She was as cute as could be and well underweight. I walked her all around the neighborhood trying to find her owner, for who would not want her back? I was unsuccessful and that’s when Dido opened negotiations. She promised that, if she could live with us, she would be very good and do everything we wanted. We capitulated. But Dido had lied. She soon took charge of the house and became the alpha dog. And we were a three-dog family!
 
I’d never had a large dog. When my wife and I decided to get a new friend, we visited an adoption agency and found the cutest most loving Dachshund. We stepped away to discuss it (I wasn’t 100% on board yet) and in that brief time the cutie had been selected by another.
 
On the way home, miserable with our loss, we stopped at a PetSmart to buy a toy for my daughter’s dog. And what was there? A Greyhound adoption agency displaying its wares! We both were hooked and before a week had passed we had the large black male Merlin running around our home. He was so big.
 
But he had a problem. He was terrified of all the sounds and sights of neighborhood living never experienced in his years in a cage. He froze on his walks, often in the middle of a street, the source of so many scary noises. I had to lift him to safety and often wondered how I’d get him home. The head of the adoption agency proposed we also adopt Onyx, another black male, and everything would be all right. She was wrong. Finally, after some training, Merlin did get over his trauma and became the best of walkers. But now we had two large dogs!
 
The head of the agency was a diabolical woman. She called and asked if we could foster Cassie, a 10-year-old who had spent her post racing life on a breeding farm because she had been such a successful runner. It would only be a couple of weeks, we were told, until an adoption was arranged. Of course, it took less than a day before we fell in love with the new arrival and once again we were with three dogs, this time big ones.
 
We lost Cassie first because of her age and brought in Callie. The greyhounds, the “cats of the dog world,” were loving, sweet animals who were the source of great joy. They are all gone now and we have four boxes of ashes and four preserved paw prints.
 
We’re down to small again, or at least medium, with Basenji and Border Collie mix Hugo who put some life into Callie’s last days and lots of joy into our present ones.
 
I don’t want another big dog, but my wife and I have decided that if the death of Greyhound racing in Florida creates too many Greyhounds to be adopted, we’ll take the plunge.
 
I am more convinced than ever, the pain of loss is more than made up for by the joy of love. That’s why we keep welcoming four-footed friends into our home.

4 Comments

The Playground

1/23/2019

4 Comments

 
There’s a large playground called Washington D.C. There children disguised as adults play. Lately Nancy and Donald and Mitch have manipulated the ups and downs of the seesaws and backs and forths of the swings. They don’t like each other, and they relish the taunts and threats of the childhood life.
 
Donald wishes to build a wall most folks don’t want so people who don’t look like him and most of his followers won’t enter the country. Nancy says it’s wrong and she’s going to stop it. Mitch sits on the sidelines waiting for Donald to tell him it’s time to play.
 
Turns out the fight between Nancy and Donald is creating financial problems for 800,000 furloughed workers and inconveniences for millions more who need government services. But that’s not a worry because Nancy and Donald and Mitch aren’t going hungry.
 
Nancy believes she has a great idea. Donald plans to give a big speech, one someone in his position has delivered every year for ages. It’s an opportunity to say how brilliant he is and tell about all the wonderful accomplishments he’s achieved. It puts him at center stage with a national audience and there’s nothing he likes more. The hitch is he needs Nancy’s permission.
 
What an opportunity for Nancy! Why, she thinks, I’ll ask him to delay his talk until he gives in on the wall and that’ll deny him the attention he craves. What a little boy he is, she thinks with scorn. She realizes it might be petulant to just refuse him, so she justifies the suggestion by noting security can’t be assured since so many government workers are off the job.
 
Now Donald thinks anyone messing with him should be placed on the playground merry-go-round and spun to oblivion. What a little girl she is, he thinks with scorn. He knows Nancy is planning to visit troops and will fly on military planes. It’s all hush hush because the enemy might just do something bad if they knew about it. Donald realizes he can’t tell Nancy not to go. However, he controls the military and so he cancels use of planes, making a public suggestion she fly commercial which would be a joy to the enemy. But he needs his own justification so he announces she should stay around to negotiate instead of taking off to the other side of the world.
 
There’s not much to like about any of this.
 
Nancy’s argument makes little sense to me. I can’t believe security surrounding Donald and all of Nancy’s colleagues isn’t maintained at the highest level despite the work stoppage. I’m sure such jobs are considered essential and that the men and women performing them are motivated independent of personal political preference.
 
Donald’s argument seems to have more merit. Certainly, in a crisis caused by the feud it makes sense to remain nearby ready to negotiate. The problem here is that Donald has no real intention of negotiating and knows Nancy staying around will have no effect. But canceling the trip satisfies the need for retaliation. Nevertheless, his stance seems the more reasonable.
 
What about poor Mitch? Hey, he says to Donald, Can I play soon?
 
Sure, Donald assures him. Tell you what. I’m going to use this weekend I kept Nancy home to propose a compromise which asks for everything I want and a small part of what they want. You can put forth legislation to accomplish that.
 
Mitch is pleased. He knows he’s still irrelevant, but maybe the action will hide his cowardice regarding fulfilling his oath to protect the Constitution.
 
It’s time for our leaders to leave the playground behind, to act like adults, and to do the right thing. Sometimes the right thing is hard to determine. But that’s why children simply aren’t up to the task.

4 Comments

An Evening to Forget

1/16/2019

0 Comments

 
About a week ago the United States did not declare war on any nation.
 
No natural disaster had devastated any part of our country.
 
No stock market crash hinted at an upcoming depression.
 
No explosions had dealt calamitous delays to the space program.
 
No, nothing so minor. Turns out our nation was faced with a ‘crisis” at our southern border as a horde of poor, undernourished and scared individuals threatened our very existence by wanting to enter the United States.
 
I knew it must be a real crisis because our president decided for the very first time in his tenure to address the nation from the Oval Office. Clearly, then, it was more dire than the prospect of North Korea lobbing missiles toward Guam. Or the killer hurricanes that ravaged Houston, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, the Florida Peninsula and elsewhere. Or the killing of 17 at a Florida high school.
 
Yes, it must be a real crisis because surely he felt the Oval Office setting had a higher status than the usual tweets that in the past have defined policy and state of mind.
 
Knowing the talk was imminent, I sat down to watch. Several fact checkers assigned “truth” to much of what he said, especially when a statement involved numbers. I’d expect him to deal with numbers expertly, although I believe the only ones he’s truly interested in have a dollar sign preceding them.
 
I’m not so sure about other statements. The only word I could think of was “hypocritical” as he assured me his interest in a wall was driven by humanitarian concerns. Really? I’m trying to think of other instances where he’s demonstrated sympathy for humanitarian issues like, say, federal workers not receiving pay checks.
 
I was surprised to learn that the Democrats wanted a steel wall and the president, in order to accommodate them, agreed that would be sufficient. Only one problem. As far as I know, not one Democrat has shown pleasure for a steel barrier. But what’s one more lie?
 
The president informed us that crime was rampant and it was all due to lack of a wall. Several incidents, undoubtedly true and certainly horrible, were laid at the feet of illegal immigrants. Many others, due to American citizens, often using guns, were not mentioned.
 
I came away realizing there was no justification for his stand except a petulant need to get the toy he wanted so he could satisfy his base so he could get reelected.
 
I looked forward to the Democratic response, eager to hear the words that would drive us forward to work for the common good. It began a few minutes after Trump had completed his remarks.
 
Ah, now it was time.
 
But wait, had I let my hard to understand TV remote take matters into its own hand and flip to an arts channel. Because my immediate reaction was I was gazing at Grant Wood’s famous painting American Gothic, except the male was on the wrong side of the woman. No, it was just Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. Standing grim-faced behind a podium that was not as wide as the sum of their two bodies. In order to overcome the discrepancy, they had crammed together so they presented as a single two-headed monster. Couldn’t they at least have had two podia?
 
Well, okay, it didn’t seem like an auspicious start, but surely their words would be inspirational and motivate us to seek the high ground.
 
The words were there. But they were the same words we’ve been hearing since the shutdown began. And they were delivered with the fire of an iceberg. To say their response was dull would be a kindness.
 
Now I have deep respect for both Schumer and Pelosi. They are smart, tough, and usually on the right side of issues. They have devoted major portions of their lives to serving our country and their own needs.
 
But we need fire now. We need youth. We need inspiration. We need a fantastic articulator. Where are they in the Democratic party? I know they exist. At my local level there are several coming into their own. But they are a decade or more from major leadership roles. It’s time to encourage those who already have the experience, the drive, the charisma, the heart to take on the future. I hope they are being groomed by the current leadership. And I hope I begin to see signs of it soon.
 
When I started to write this, I Googled “american gothic picture” to refresh my memory and make sure my initial reaction was correct. I found I was not the only one to make the comparison. A row of copies of the classic art ranging in price from $6.60 to $77.49 was followed by a row of images of Schumer and Pelosi. One of them was termed “The New American Gothic.” And I thought I was so smart coming up with the similarity!
 
I find the comparison of the old and new American Gothics scary. I want a future run by correct-thinking people who don’t remind me of a 90-year-old painting.
0 Comments

Don't Be a Knee-JERK

1/9/2019

2 Comments

 
I am not a fan of our current president. There is so much that is offensive, from his ugly tweets to his beratement of those who have attempted to be loyal to him. It seems to take the smallest transgression to transform a faithful supporter to a hated outcast. He is insecure, unable to recognize and admit an error. The only way to assuage his fragile ego is to have a win, no matter the cost to others. Often his policies, such as withdrawals from the Iran agreement and the Paris climate accords, make no sense. I could go on and on, a litany of resentments taking hold of me since his entry into politics.
 
When he announces a policy my gut reaction is to be offended, decide it’s just another indication of his incompetence, and hope it doesn’t work. As an example, consider the tariffs he has been placing on friend and foe. When I first heard about them, I immediately declared them a terrible idea. I couldn’t wait for the policy to blow up in his face.
 
Eventually it occurred to me, and it has been difficult to admit, that my opinion on issues was being formed from knowledge of the source rather than knowledge of the issue. If Trump says he’s for it, I’m against it.
 
I finally realized this was a terrible way to think, going against all my training as a mathematician. I know that evil people can sometimes say wise things. But my attitude didn’t allow me to discern such occasions. I was being the jerk in knee-jerk.
 
I believe China has been attempting to capture our technical expertise by demanding it as a condition for a business to operate in the country and by stealing it in any other way possible. So why was I blaming the president for tackling that problem via tariffs, and perhaps other means. Knee-jerk!
 
I’m a strong believer in immigration. Every day I’m grateful for the folks from various regions of the world who touch my life, from work friendships to close friends to varieties of tasty foods I’d never otherwise sample. So when Trump attacked the arrival of those from other lands, I immediately formed an opinion he was wrong in every sense. But we’ve always had an immigration policy, often flawed, from early days in our country. So why wasn’t I examining the issue more closely? Knee-jerk!
 
Don’t get me wrong. Recognizing the problem does not imply accepting Trump’s solution to it. I think his approaches often border on the insane and without a doubt on the cruel. What I’m saying is I should not state a problem doesn’t exist just because Trump says it does. But I don’t have to agree with his solution method either.
 
It turns out knee-jerkism isn’t a partisan disease or even close.
 
One need only mention climate change. I will never understand how any individual cannot accept the evidence that shows conclusively our planet is in a race to destruction, not 200 years from now, not 100, but closer to 30. Ah, now I understand. Knee-jerk!
 
How about Medicare for All? Just the words invoke cries of socialism by those with no knowledge how such a system would be implemented or even if there might be workable ways of handling it. Or even what socialism really is. Knee-jerk!
 
Knee-jerkism appears on both sides of almost every major issue. As an example, consider the special prosecutor investigation into the Trump campaign involvement with Russia. One side is absolutely convinced it will lead to impeachment. The other considers it a witch hunt without merit. Neither side knows what the final outcome will be, but both sides have their stands staked out independent of knowledge. Knee-jerk!
 
Many exhibiting the knee-jerk disease have zero understanding of the issues, relying only on the source they choose to dictate their position. Say Trump and we’re against it. Say Obama and they’re against it.
 
Knee-jerkism is dangerous. Those of us who employ it could bring disaster. Because it doesn’t allow us to recognize real problems, and, if we don’t recognize them, we can’t solve them. Even worse, if it causes me to take a stand that eventually turns out to be wrong, I will have done harm to the political side I favor.
 
So I beg us all, me especially, not to engage in the activity. Because every time I do I am giving up my ability to think freely, to analyze a situation and make up my own mind. I don’t want to be like that.

2 Comments

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed